Enthalpy Change for the Dissociation of Diborane
In this exercise the relative accuracy of the Hartree-Fock (HF) and density functional (DFT) methods will be examined. The reaction enthalpy at 298 K for the dissociation of diborane (eq 1) will be calculated with these methods and the resulting theoretical values for DHdiss will be compared with experimental values. Over a period of thirty years thermodynamic, kinetic, and mass spectrometric techniques have been used to measure DHdiss and the values obtained have varied from 28 to 59 kcal/mol. In the most recent publication1 the authors reported the range for DHdiss to be (36.2 - 41.0) +/- 2 kcal/mol at 298 K.
Procedure:
- BH3 (See the Tutorial for Hartree-Fock Calculation )
- Use Spartan '02 to open the bh3.Spartan file in your folder.
- Use the Hartree-Fock method with the 6-31G* basis set to optimize the geometry. Start from the AM1 geometry.
- Compute frequencies and print the thermodynamic quantities and vibrational modes to the output file.
- Save the calculations to the bh3_HF.Spartan file in your folder.
- Next, open the bh3.Spartan file and use the Density Functional method with theB3LYP/6-31G* basis set to optimize the geometry. Start from the 6-31G* geometry.
- Compute frequencies and print the thermodynamic quantities and vibrational modes to the output file.
- Save the calculations to the bh3_DFT.Spartan file in your folder.
- B2H6
- Use Spartan '02 to build and minimize B2H6.
- Optimize the geometry with the AM1 semi-empirical method and save the results to the b2h6.Spartan file in your folder. Starting with the AM1 geometry, use the Hartree-Fock method with the 3-21G* basis set to optimize the geometry. Finally, start with the 3-21G* geometry and optimize the geometry with Hartree-Fock method and the 6-31G* basis set. Generally, this sequential process is less costly in CPU time than a single-step optimization with Hartree-Fock method and the 6-31G* basis set.
- In the last optimization step (HF/6-31G*) compute frequencies and print the thermodynamic quantities and vibrational modes to the output file.
- Save the calculations to the b2h6_HF.Spartan file in your folder.
- Next, open the b2h6.Spartan file and use the Density Functional method with theB3LYP/6-31G* basis set to optimize the geometry. Start from the 6-31G* geometry.
- Compute frequencies and print the thermodynamic quantities and vibrational modes to the output file.
- Save the calculations to the b2h6_DFT.Spartan file in your folder.
- Calculate DHdiss at 298 K
- Calculate the difference in the electonic energy,
. Note that the electronic energy computed by the Hartree-Fock and Density Functional methods is in units of hartrees. Use the conversion factor 627.5095 kcal/mol-hartree to express DEe in units of kcal/mol.
- Calculate the difference in the zero-point energy,
. The Hartree-Fock method calculates vibrational frequencies that are approximately 10% larger than the experimental values. For this reason a scaling factor is applied to the Hartree-Fock vibrational frequencies, zero-point energies,and vibrational energies. When vibrational frequencies are computed with the HF/6-31G(d) method, a scaling factor of 0.9135 is used to correct the zero-point energy and vibrational energy.2 Be sure to multiply the Hartree-Fock value for DE00 by 0.9135. The scaling factors for most density functional methods are near 1.0 ( 0.9804 in the case of B3LYP/6-31G*).
- Calculate the difference in the vibrational energy,
. Be sure to multiply the Hartree-Fock value for DHv298 by 0.9135.
- Calculate the difference in the rotational energy,
.
- Calculate the difference in the translatonal energy,
.
- For a constant temperature and constant pressure process, PDV = DnRT and hence
.
Questions:
- What is the value of DHdiss obtained from the Hartree-Fock (HF) method?
- What is the value of DHdiss obtained from the density functional (DFT) method?
- Are the calculated (HF and DFT) values of DHdiss in good agreement with experimental data?
- Is the HF or DFT method less costly in terms of CPU time ?
1) Ruscic, B.; Mayhw, C. A.; Berkowitz, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 5580.
2) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 5580.
Nutt 00